<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL, SAP, and MaxDB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Software Memories&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Software AG memories</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/#comment-63388</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Memories&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Software AG memories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=6#comment-63388</guid>
		<description>[...] by Darmstadt, then spun out and taken public again, then bought again. The company came out with ADABAS-D and Tamino, neither of which was a great success. Even so, it&#8217;s still alive, kicking, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] by Darmstadt, then spun out and taken public again, then bought again. The company came out with ADABAS-D and Tamino, neither of which was a great success. Even so, it&#8217;s still alive, kicking, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; SAP, MaxDB, and MySQL, updated</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; SAP, MaxDB, and MySQL, updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=6#comment-289</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve had a chance to clarify and correct my understanding of the relationship between SAP, MaxDB, and MySQL. The story is this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve had a chance to clarify and correct my understanding of the relationship between SAP, MaxDB, and MySQL. The story is this: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=6#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] And of course, the memory-centric ROLAP tool BI Accelerator &#8212; technology that&#8217;s based on TREX &#8212; is just another example of how SAP is willing to go beyond passively connecting to a single RDBMS. And while their sponsorship of MaxDB isn&#8217;t really an example of that, it is another example of how SAP&#8217;s strategy is not one to gladden the hearts of the top-tier DBMS vendors.      &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And of course, the memory-centric ROLAP tool BI Accelerator &#8212; technology that&#8217;s based on TREX &#8212; is just another example of how SAP is willing to go beyond passively connecting to a single RDBMS. And while their sponsorship of MaxDB isn&#8217;t really an example of that, it is another example of how SAP&#8217;s strategy is not one to gladden the hearts of the top-tier DBMS vendors.      &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; So how robust is Ingres?</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/08/08/mysql-and-maxdb-2/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; So how robust is Ingres?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=6#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] Where Ingres definitely seems to lag is in data warehousing. E.g., there are no materialized views, and I bet that even if they have some of the index types such as bitmaps, star schemas, etc., the implementation, optimizer support, administrative support, and so on lag far behind that of Oracle and IBM. So again, the proper comparison for Ingres isn&#8217;t Oracle and IBM; it&#8217;s fellow open source vendor MySQL. Only &#8212; deserved or not, MySQL has a ton of momentum for such a small company, incuding an attractive product plan partially fueled by SAP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Where Ingres definitely seems to lag is in data warehousing. E.g., there are no materialized views, and I bet that even if they have some of the index types such as bitmaps, star schemas, etc., the implementation, optimizer support, administrative support, and so on lag far behind that of Oracle and IBM. So again, the proper comparison for Ingres isn&#8217;t Oracle and IBM; it&#8217;s fellow open source vendor MySQL. Only &#8212; deserved or not, MySQL has a ton of momentum for such a small company, incuding an attractive product plan partially fueled by SAP. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
