<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relational DBMS versus text data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text data management, Part 1: Confusion &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-249349</link>
		<dc:creator>Text data management, Part 1: Confusion &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-249349</guid>
		<description>[...] are probably fewer people now than there were six years ago who need to be told that text and relational database management are very different things. Other misconceptions, however, appear to be on the rise. Specific points that are commonly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are probably fewer people now than there were six years ago who need to be told that text and relational database management are very different things. Other misconceptions, however, appear to be on the rise. Specific points that are commonly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What to do about &#8220;unstructured data&#8221; &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-222544</link>
		<dc:creator>What to do about &#8220;unstructured data&#8221; &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 21:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-222544</guid>
		<description>[...] In December, 2005 I expounded on the mismatch between text data and the relational model. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In December, 2005 I expounded on the mismatch between text data and the relational model. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imitatio creatio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SQL przyszłości</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-103295</link>
		<dc:creator>imitatio creatio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SQL przyszłości</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-103295</guid>
		<description>[...] Po pierwsze, SQL/MM Full-Text na razie jest tylko w ułamkowej części implementowany przez niektóre silniki bazodanowe. Po drugie, relacyjne bazy danych mają swoje ograniczenia. Widoczne są one także na polu wyszukiwania &#8220;ze zrozumieniem&#8221; - bo w sumie do tego dążymy jak się chwilę zastanowić. Pisze o tym np. Curt Monash w artykule Relational DBMS versus text data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Po pierwsze, SQL/MM Full-Text na razie jest tylko w ułamkowej części implementowany przez niektóre silniki bazodanowe. Po drugie, relacyjne bazy danych mają swoje ograniczenia. Widoczne są one także na polu wyszukiwania &#8220;ze zrozumieniem&#8221; &#8211; bo w sumie do tego dążymy jak się chwilę zastanowić. Pisze o tym np. Curt Monash w artykule Relational DBMS versus text data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Complete Rewrite</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-100259</link>
		<dc:creator>Complete Rewrite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-100259</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Text Search and the Relational Model...&lt;/strong&gt;

Since text search is one of my top areas of expertise, I hope I can explain to you why the relational model is perfectly capable of capturing the structure of text. I&#039;ll start at the very bottom, explaining what text search really is....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Text Search and the Relational Model&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Since text search is one of my top areas of expertise, I hope I can explain to you why the relational model is perfectly capable of capturing the structure of text. I&#8217;ll start at the very bottom, explaining what text search really is&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 4 main approaches to datatype extensibility &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-89080</link>
		<dc:creator>The 4 main approaches to datatype extensibility &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-89080</guid>
		<description>[...] Text search is a huge business on the web, and a separate big business in enterprises. And text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational paradigm at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Text search is a huge business on the web, and a separate big business in enterprises. And text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational paradigm at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; FAST said to be pursuing BI</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-16655</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; FAST said to be pursuing BI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-16655</guid>
		<description>[...] EDIT:   Point #4 of my post on the mismatch between relational databases and text search is pretty relevant here.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EDIT:   Point #4 of my post on the mismatch between relational databases and text search is pretty relevant here.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnterpriseSearchEngines.net &#187; The problem of text in relational databases</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>EnterpriseSearchEngines.net &#187; The problem of text in relational databases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-852</guid>
		<description>[...] Curt Monash has some observations about search, meaning, semantics, the suitability of relational DBMS to manage text data and similar subjects: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Curt Monash has some observations about search, meaning, semantics, the suitability of relational DBMS to manage text data and similar subjects: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Rappoport</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Rappoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I agree with this entirely -- wrote an article on the related topic of searching text and how DBMSs just tend to be the wrong model,  http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html.  I will link to this as well, it as you have more of the database architecture details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this entirely &#8212; wrote an article on the related topic of searching text and how DBMSs just tend to be the wrong model,  <a href="http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html</a>.  I will link to this as well, it as you have more of the database architecture details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Misunderstandings of text management</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Misunderstandings of text management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the biggest is in the area of text. They fail to see how text data management is fundamentally different from tabular data management. Here&#8217;s a little article explaining why text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational model.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the biggest is in the area of text. They fail to see how text data management is fundamentally different from tabular data management. Here&#8217;s a little article explaining why text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational model.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

