<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relational DBMS versus text data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; FAST said to be pursuing BI</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-16655</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; FAST said to be pursuing BI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-16655</guid>
		<description>[...] EDIT:   Point #4 of my post on the mismatch between relational databases and text search is pretty relevant here.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] EDIT:   Point #4 of my post on the mismatch between relational databases and text search is pretty relevant here.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnterpriseSearchEngines.net &#187; The problem of text in relational databases</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>EnterpriseSearchEngines.net &#187; The problem of text in relational databases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-852</guid>
		<description>[...] Curt Monash has some observations about search, meaning, semantics, the suitability of relational DBMS to manage text data and similar subjects: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Curt Monash has some observations about search, meaning, semantics, the suitability of relational DBMS to manage text data and similar subjects: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Rappoport</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Rappoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I agree with this entirely -- wrote an article on the related topic of searching text and how DBMSs just tend to be the wrong model,  http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html.  I will link to this as well, it as you have more of the database architecture details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this entirely &#8212; wrote an article on the related topic of searching text and how DBMSs just tend to be the wrong model,  <a href="http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchtools.com/info/database-search.html</a>.  I will link to this as well, it as you have more of the database architecture details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Misunderstandings of text management</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Misunderstandings of text management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2005/12/09/relational-dbms-versus-text-data/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the biggest is in the area of text. They fail to see how text data management is fundamentally different from tabular data management. Here&#8217;s a little article explaining why text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational model.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One of the biggest is in the area of text. They fail to see how text data management is fundamentally different from tabular data management. Here&#8217;s a little article explaining why text doesn&#8217;t fit well into the relational model.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
