<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally a column on XML storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/16/finally-a-column-on-xml-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/16/finally-a-column-on-xml-storage/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Oracle, graphical data models, and RDF</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/16/finally-a-column-on-xml-storage/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Oracle, graphical data models, and RDF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=45#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>[...] So what do I think about all this? Well, it all sounds pretty smart. But that’s what one would expect me to think. Historically I’ve been a huge fan of Oracle’s text-search-in-SQL, OLAP-in-SQL, and so on. And generally I’ve turned out to be rather lonely in my enthusiasm. So on this one, while the story certainly sounds good, I think I’ll wait and see if Oracle can do a better job of being fully competitive than it did in those other areas. Also, I’d be more inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt if they hadn’t allowed themselves to fall behind in supporting XML. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So what do I think about all this? Well, it all sounds pretty smart. But that’s what one would expect me to think. Historically I’ve been a huge fan of Oracle’s text-search-in-SQL, OLAP-in-SQL, and so on. And generally I’ve turned out to be rather lonely in my enthusiasm. So on this one, while the story certainly sounds good, I think I’ll wait and see if Oracle can do a better job of being fully competitive than it did in those other areas. Also, I’d be more inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt if they hadn’t allowed themselves to fall behind in supporting XML. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Marklogic&#8217;s experiences &#8212; from the warhorse&#8217;s mouth!</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/16/finally-a-column-on-xml-storage/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Marklogic&#8217;s experiences &#8212; from the warhorse&#8217;s mouth!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=45#comment-836</guid>
		<description>[...] Another subject I meant to blog about is what all I&#8217;ve learned from Marklogic about customer uses for XML. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another subject I meant to blog about is what all I&#8217;ve learned from Marklogic about customer uses for XML. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
