<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAP, MaxDB, and MySQL, updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:22:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SAP takes back MaxDB from MySQL &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-93361</link>
		<dc:creator>SAP takes back MaxDB from MySQL &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=49#comment-93361</guid>
		<description>[...] back in January, 2006, I wrote that MaxDB was not getting merged into MySQL. Given that, it makes sense for SAP to take back control of the product. As The Reg reports, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back in January, 2006, I wrote that MaxDB was not getting merged into MySQL. Given that, it makes sense for SAP to take back control of the product. As The Reg reports, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-61957</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=49#comment-61957</guid>
		<description>Thomas,

How much money are we talking about?  And how does the price compare to that of Oracle or DB2 or other DBMS that can be bought off of SAP&#039;s price list?

Thanks!

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>How much money are we talking about?  And how does the price compare to that of Oracle or DB2 or other DBMS that can be bought off of SAP&#8217;s price list?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Pham</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-61910</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=49#comment-61910</guid>
		<description>SAP has ended their relationship with MySQL as of Nov. 2007.  This has been a big disappointment for our client. Instead of paying MAXDB database as needed for each production database instance, SAP is now requiring them to pay the full 3% fee of SAP licensing to use MAXDB.

Thomas Pham
www.pandainc.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAP has ended their relationship with MySQL as of Nov. 2007.  This has been a big disappointment for our client. Instead of paying MAXDB database as needed for each production database instance, SAP is now requiring them to pay the full 3% fee of SAP licensing to use MAXDB.</p>
<p>Thomas Pham<br />
<a href="http://www.pandainc.net" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.pandainc.net');" rel="nofollow">http://www.pandainc.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; MySQL vs. the big guys</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-20056</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; MySQL vs. the big guys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=49#comment-20056</guid>
		<description>[...] As I&#8217;ve previously noted, the expectation is that MySQL will wind up getting share in SAP&#8217;s customer base. At least, the expectation is that their technology will be good enough to do so. The business reasons for SAP to favor this outcome are of course pretty obvious. Almost the only remaining question is whether SAP will back MySQL with great force, or whether it will divide its love between MySQL and its own inhouse DBMS product MaxDB.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve previously noted, the expectation is that MySQL will wind up getting share in SAP&#8217;s customer base. At least, the expectation is that their technology will be good enough to do so. The business reasons for SAP to favor this outcome are of course pretty obvious. Almost the only remaining question is whether SAP will back MySQL with great force, or whether it will divide its love between MySQL and its own inhouse DBMS product MaxDB.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; MySQL disclaims interest in the ERP market</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/01/26/sap-maxdb-and-mysql-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; MySQL disclaims interest in the ERP market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=49#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] With Oracle acquiring first Innobase and now Sleepycat, MySQL has been under the gun to position itself more sharply. In response, their CEO reportedly disclaimed interest in the ERP market. That surprises me, as it contradicts what I hear from SAP, and have heard from the company in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Oracle acquiring first Innobase and now Sleepycat, MySQL has been under the gun to position itself more sharply. In response, their CEO reportedly disclaimed interest in the ERP market. That surprises me, as it contradicts what I hear from SAP, and have heard from the company in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.609 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-05 06:47:02 -->
