<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM&#8217;s definition of native XML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/04/10/ibms-definition-of-native-xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/04/10/ibms-definition-of-native-xml/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who is doing what in XML data management these days? &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/04/10/ibms-definition-of-native-xml/#comment-89098</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is doing what in XML data management these days? &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=64#comment-89098</guid>
		<description>[...] XML support hasn&#8217;t proved to be very important yet to the big DBMS vendors, somewhat to my surprise. When last I looked, the situation wasn&#8217;t much different from what it was back in November, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XML support hasn&#8217;t proved to be very important yet to the big DBMS vendors, somewhat to my surprise. When last I looked, the situation wasn&#8217;t much different from what it was back in November, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
