<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QlikView – a leader in memory-centric BI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/08/10/qlik-view-%e2%80%93-a-leader-in-memory-centric-bi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/08/10/qlik-view-%e2%80%93-a-leader-in-memory-centric-bi/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; QlikTech numbers update</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/08/10/qlik-view-%e2%80%93-a-leader-in-memory-centric-bi/#comment-18249</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; QlikTech numbers update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2006/08/10/qlik-view-%e2%80%93-a-leader-in-memory-centric-bi/#comment-18249</guid>
		<description>[...] I chatted with QlikTech again yesterday. The update on their numbers is that they ended 2006 with 5,436 customers in 68 countries. Of those, 3,200 were added over the year. (I.e., they only had 2,200 or so at the end of 2005.) Revenue growth was slightly more than 80% for the year, for the third straight year over 80%. (I think their real goal is to double.) That should put them at $40 million or so in license fees, for classical BI only. (Budgeting/planning features are apparently slated for QlikView Release 8 in May.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I chatted with QlikTech again yesterday. The update on their numbers is that they ended 2006 with 5,436 customers in 68 countries. Of those, 3,200 were added over the year. (I.e., they only had 2,200 or so at the end of 2005.) Revenue growth was slightly more than 80% for the year, for the third straight year over 80%. (I think their real goal is to double.) That should put them at $40 million or so in license fees, for classical BI only. (Budgeting/planning features are apparently slated for QlikView Release 8 in May.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
