<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netezza vs. conventional data warehousing RDBMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infobright BrightHouse &#8212; columnar, VERY compressed, simple, and related to MySQL</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-82939</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Infobright BrightHouse &#8212; columnar, VERY compressed, simple, and related to MySQL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-82939</guid>
		<description>[...] information is stored in data pack nodes,* one per data pack. If you&#8217;re familiar with Netezza zone maps, data pack nodes sound like zone maps on steroids. They store maximum values, minimum values, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] information is stored in data pack nodes,* one per data pack. If you&#8217;re familiar with Netezza zone maps, data pack nodes sound like zone maps on steroids. They store maximum values, minimum values, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Competitive issues in data warehouse ease of administration</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-6993</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Competitive issues in data warehouse ease of administration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-6993</guid>
		<description>[...] Netezza has no indices at all. And no caches. And the hardware is preconfigured. This all makes administration pretty simple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Netezza has no indices at all. And no caches. And the hardware is preconfigured. This all makes administration pretty simple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Netezza’s chip story</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Netezza’s chip story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/20/netezza-vs-conventional-data-warehousing-rdbms/#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>[...] In addition to its software story, Netezza of course has a rather unique chip story. Where other vendors might have standard disk controllers and high-powered microprocessors, Netezza respectively has a FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) and lesser microprocessor (PowerPC). Netezza claims that the advantages of these choices are: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition to its software story, Netezza of course has a rather unique chip story. Where other vendors might have standard disk controllers and high-powered microprocessors, Netezza respectively has a FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) and lesser microprocessor (PowerPC). Netezza claims that the advantages of these choices are: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.201 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 10:21:17 -->

