<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle and Microsoft in data warehousing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/27/oracle-and-microsoft-in-data-warehousing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/27/oracle-and-microsoft-in-data-warehousing/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Why Oracle and Microsoft will lose in VLDB data warehousing</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/27/oracle-and-microsoft-in-data-warehousing/#comment-20769</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Why Oracle and Microsoft will lose in VLDB data warehousing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2006/09/27/oracle-and-microsoft-in-data-warehousing/#comment-20769</guid>
		<description>[...] I think that&#8217;s correct, but here&#8217;s my best try at a counter-argument.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think that&#8217;s correct, but here&#8217;s my best try at a counter-argument.       &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

