<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data integration appliance vendor Cast Iron Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cast Iron Systems focuses on SaaS data integration</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-82947</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cast Iron Systems focuses on SaaS data integration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-82947</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote about data integration vendor Cast Iron Systems a year ago, its core message was &#8220;simplicity, simplicity, simplicity.&#8221; Supporting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I wrote about data integration vendor Cast Iron Systems a year ago, its core message was &#8220;simplicity, simplicity, simplicity.&#8221; Supporting [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The boom in Salesforce.com integration</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-22093</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The boom in Salesforce.com integration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-22093</guid>
		<description>[...] I just rechecked my notes from my January talk with Cast Iron Systems. A large part of Cast Iron&#8217;s new business is also integration with Salesforce.com, Netsuite, and other SaaS vendors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I just rechecked my notes from my January talk with Cast Iron Systems. A large part of Cast Iron&#8217;s new business is also integration with Salesforce.com, Netsuite, and other SaaS vendors. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-16002</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/04/data-integration-appliance-vendor-cast-iron-systems/#comment-16002</guid>
		<description>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
