<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data warehouse appliance hardware strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:12:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kickfire kicks off &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-109683</link>
		<dc:creator>Kickfire kicks off &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-109683</guid>
		<description>[...] makes a Type 0 appliance. If I understood correctly, it contains the chip, a couple of standard CPU cores, and 64 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes a Type 0 appliance. If I understood correctly, it contains the chip, a couple of standard CPU cores, and 64 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infology.Ru &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Комплексы для хранилищ данных – факты и вымыслы</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-94734</link>
		<dc:creator>Infology.Ru &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Комплексы для хранилищ данных – факты и вымыслы</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-94734</guid>
		<description>[...] например, DATAllegro, Vertica, ParAccel, Greenplum, и Infobright — предлагают комплексы типа 2. (Dataupia является ещё одним [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] например, DATAllegro, Vertica, ParAccel, Greenplum, и Infobright — предлагают комплексы типа 2. (Dataupia является ещё одним [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data warehouse appliances – fact and fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-85762</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data warehouse appliances – fact and fiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-85762</guid>
		<description>[...] Netezza &#8212; for example, DATAllegro, Vertica, ParAccel, Greenplum, and Infobright &#8212; offer Type 2 appliances. (Dataupia is another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Netezza &#8212; for example, DATAllegro, Vertica, ParAccel, Greenplum, and Infobright &#8212; offer Type 2 appliances. (Dataupia is another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Full Table Scan</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-82533</link>
		<dc:creator>Full Table Scan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-82533</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;My Definition of Appliance...&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s been an increasing amount of discussion lately about what is and isn&#039;t an appliance, what types of appliances there are, etc. especially given today&#039;s announcement by Teradata.  Personally, I don&#039;t quite understand what all the fuss is abou...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>My Definition of Appliance&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been an increasing amount of discussion lately about what is and isn&#8217;t an appliance, what types of appliances there are, etc. especially given today&#8217;s announcement by Teradata.  Personally, I don&#8217;t quite understand what all the fuss is abou&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; When and why to virtualize</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-23528</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; When and why to virtualize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-23528</guid>
		<description>[...] Just to be safe, don&#8217;t virtualize apps that are already I/O-bound or otherwise running flat-out. (So there&#8217;s no contradiction to my support for dedicated security, networking, and data warehouse appliances.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just to be safe, don&#8217;t virtualize apps that are already I/O-bound or otherwise running flat-out. (So there&#8217;s no contradiction to my support for dedicated security, networking, and data warehouse appliances.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Appliances &#8212; my conclusions! (For now, at least)</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-16726</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Appliances &#8212; my conclusions! (For now, at least)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-16726</guid>
		<description>[...] Subsequent to submitting the column, I developed a simpler taxonomy of computing appliance types, namely: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Subsequent to submitting the column, I developed a simpler taxonomy of computing appliance types, namely: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-16583</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 07:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/data-warehouse-appliance-hardware-strategies/#comment-16583</guid>
		<description>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221;  (EDIT:  I actually gave names to three strategies &#8212; even if they were just &#8220;Type 0&#8243;, &#8220;Type 1&#8243;, and &#8220;Type 2&#8243; &#8212; in this overview of data warehouse appliance vendors.  And in another post I considered arguments about whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221;  (EDIT:  I actually gave names to three strategies &#8212; even if they were just &#8220;Type 0&#8243;, &#8220;Type 1&#8243;, and &#8220;Type 2&#8243; &#8212; in this overview of data warehouse appliance vendors.  And in another post I considered arguments about whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.190 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-01 19:32:36 -->
