<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And then there were two:  DATAllegro seems to be going with standard hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/#comment-86596</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guide to my recent research on computing appliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 09:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/#comment-86596</guid>
		<description>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. (EDIT: I actually gave names to three strategies &#8212; even if they were just &#8220;Type 0&#8243;, &#8220;Type 1&#8243;, and &#8220;Type 2&#8243; &#8212; in this overview of data warehouse appliance vendors. And in another post I considered arguments about whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all.) Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; (ANOTHER EDIT: But I think DATAllegro&#8217;s strategy has changed.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. (EDIT: I actually gave names to three strategies &#8212; even if they were just &#8220;Type 0&#8243;, &#8220;Type 1&#8243;, and &#8220;Type 2&#8243; &#8212; in this overview of data warehouse appliance vendors. And in another post I considered arguments about whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all.) Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).&#8221; (ANOTHER EDIT: But I think DATAllegro&#8217;s strategy has changed.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dataupia – low-end data warehouse appliances</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/#comment-82931</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dataupia – low-end data warehouse appliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/01/27/datallegro-going-with-standard-hardware/#comment-82931</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 appliances, which most other data warehouse appliance vendors (Teradata excepted) have moved away from. And there actually seems to be very little special about the hardware design to take advantage of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 appliances, which most other data warehouse appliance vendors (Teradata excepted) have moved away from. And there actually seems to be very little special about the hardware design to take advantage of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
