<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SolidDB caching for DB2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/20/soliddb-caching-for-db2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/20/soliddb-caching-for-db2/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM acquires SolidDB to compete with Oracle TimesTen</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/20/soliddb-caching-for-db2/#comment-86440</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM acquires SolidDB to compete with Oracle TimesTen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/20/soliddb-caching-for-db2/#comment-86440</guid>
		<description>[...] strongly suggests that IBM is buying Solid mainly to compete with Oracle TimesTen. As of last June, solidDB was already IBM&#8217;s TimesTen answer via a partnership; this deal just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strongly suggests that IBM is buying Solid mainly to compete with Oracle TimesTen. As of last June, solidDB was already IBM&#8217;s TimesTen answer via a partnership; this deal just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

