<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memory-centric vs. conventional DBMS &#8212; a Solid difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM acquires SolidDB to compete with Oracle TimesTen</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-86437</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IBM acquires SolidDB to compete with Oracle TimesTen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-86437</guid>
		<description>[...] is actually a very interesting hybrid disk/in-memory memory-centric database management system. However, the press release announcing the deal makes it sound as if solidDB is in-memory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is actually a very interesting hybrid disk/in-memory memory-centric database management system. However, the press release announcing the deal makes it sound as if solidDB is in-memory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mike Stonebraker calls for the complete destruction of the old DBMS order</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-85763</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mike Stonebraker calls for the complete destruction of the old DBMS order</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-85763</guid>
		<description>[...] same data access methods (i.e, b-trees). Changing the data structure – e.g., to something like solidDB&#8217;s – should provide some further speedups [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same data access methods (i.e, b-trees). Changing the data structure – e.g., to something like solidDB&#8217;s – should provide some further speedups [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OraTransplant &#187; Log Buffer #51: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-41802</link>
		<dc:creator>OraTransplant &#187; Log Buffer #51: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/06/22/in-memory-database-solid/#comment-41802</guid>
		<description>[...] wouldn&#8217;t fit in any of the other paragraphs. Curt Monash has an interesting article about SolidDB, a memory-centric database. Sue Harper, from Oracle, has a great tip for using a screen magnifier. Also great when showing of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wouldn&#8217;t fit in any of the other paragraphs. Curt Monash has an interesting article about SolidDB, a memory-centric database. Sue Harper, from Oracle, has a great tip for using a screen magnifier. Also great when showing of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
