<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market reach tidbits from Netezza&#8217;s conference call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/09/24/market-reach-tidbits-from-netezzas-conference-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/09/24/market-reach-tidbits-from-netezzas-conference-call/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/09/24/market-reach-tidbits-from-netezzas-conference-call/#comment-54075</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/09/24/market-reach-tidbits-from-netezzas-conference-call/#comment-54075</guid>
		<description>Curt,

Netezza actually did 8 new deals last quarter. 

You're correct in saying that we are generally doing fewer deals at a higher average deal size. You're also correct in surmising that we are doing less revenue - although I wouldn't characterize it as Netezza having "much more revenue", especially when you just consider revenue from new customers.

Netezza's growth has been flat at 50-60% for quite a while now. In contrast, our revenue growth rate is a multiple of Netezza's - and it's being sustained over a period of time. As a result, we're catching up pretty quickly.

This seems to me a classic case of a first mover on a proprietary platform being challenged by a fast follower on a non-proprietary platform. The advantage of the latter is the ability to bring large partners to bear. In our case, we are partnering closely with EMC &#38; Dell globally and just announced an OEM deal with Bull in Europe. We're seeing more and more prospects that won't consider Netezza for these reasons.

Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt,</p>
<p>Netezza actually did 8 new deals last quarter. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct in saying that we are generally doing fewer deals at a higher average deal size. You&#8217;re also correct in surmising that we are doing less revenue - although I wouldn&#8217;t characterize it as Netezza having &#8220;much more revenue&#8221;, especially when you just consider revenue from new customers.</p>
<p>Netezza&#8217;s growth has been flat at 50-60% for quite a while now. In contrast, our revenue growth rate is a multiple of Netezza&#8217;s - and it&#8217;s being sustained over a period of time. As a result, we&#8217;re catching up pretty quickly.</p>
<p>This seems to me a classic case of a first mover on a proprietary platform being challenged by a fast follower on a non-proprietary platform. The advantage of the latter is the ability to bring large partners to bear. In our case, we are partnering closely with EMC &amp; Dell globally and just announced an OEM deal with Bull in Europe. We&#8217;re seeing more and more prospects that won&#8217;t consider Netezza for these reasons.</p>
<p>Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
