<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing versus reality on the one-petabyte barrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:56:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Netezza targets 1 petabyte &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-123136</link>
		<dc:creator>Netezza targets 1 petabyte &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/#comment-123136</guid>
		<description>[...] this leaves Netezza&#8217;s high-end capability about 10X below Teradata&#8217;s. On the other hand, it should leave them capable of handling pretty much every Teradata database in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this leaves Netezza&#8217;s high-end capability about 10X below Teradata&#8217;s. On the other hand, it should leave them capable of handling pretty much every Teradata database in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teradata&#8217;s Petabyte Power Players &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-99480</link>
		<dc:creator>Teradata&#8217;s Petabyte Power Players &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/#comment-99480</guid>
		<description>[...] club.  These are enterprises with 1+ petabyte of data on Teradata equipment.  As is commonly the case when Teradata discusses such figures, there&#8217;s some confusion as to how they&#8217;re actually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] club.  These are enterprises with 1+ petabyte of data on Teradata equipment.  As is commonly the case when Teradata discusses such figures, there&#8217;s some confusion as to how they&#8217;re actually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teradata apparently has crossed the petabyte barrier &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-88311</link>
		<dc:creator>Teradata apparently has crossed the petabyte barrier &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/marketing-versus-reality-on-the-one-petabyte-barrier/#comment-88311</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: That wasn&#8217;t really 1+ petabyte of user data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: That wasn&#8217;t really 1+ petabyte of user data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.201 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-04 12:02:47 -->
