<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet more on petabyte-scale Teradata databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/yet-more-on-petabyte-scale-teradata-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/yet-more-on-petabyte-scale-teradata-databases/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: xlrdbms</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/yet-more-on-petabyte-scale-teradata-databases/#comment-66714</link>
		<dc:creator>xlrdbms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/09/yet-more-on-petabyte-scale-teradata-databases/#comment-66714</guid>
		<description>While Wal**mart has multiple large systems, the real Petabyte Teradata systems are not there. These xldb Teradata systems are more and more LINUX based, which should be quite a surprise for many experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Wal**mart has multiple large systems, the real Petabyte Teradata systems are not there. These xldb Teradata systems are more and more LINUX based, which should be quite a surprise for many experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
