<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vertica &#8212; just star and snowflake schemas?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/23/vertica-star-snowflake-schema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/23/vertica-star-snowflake-schema/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: How well do Netezza, Greenplum, Vertica and others handle 12-way joins?</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/23/vertica-star-snowflake-schema/#comment-61758</link>
		<dc:creator>How well do Netezza, Greenplum, Vertica and others handle 12-way joins?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/23/vertica-star-snowflake-schema/#comment-61758</guid>
		<description>[...] distributed system replicates the dimension tables on each node and partitions the fact table. Vertica says that they have customers that use more transactional models, but what does that mean for overall performance? Greenplum&#8217;s website says: &#8220;Utilizes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] distributed system replicates the dimension tables on each node and partitions the fact table. Vertica says that they have customers that use more transactional models, but what does that mean for overall performance? Greenplum&#8217;s website says: &#8220;Utilizes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
