Comments on: Database management system choices — mid-range-relational http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/15/mid-range-relational-database-management/ Choices in data management and analysis Fri, 16 May 2008 23:32:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Curt Monash http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/15/mid-range-relational-database-management/#comment-72977 Curt Monash Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:24:41 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/15/mid-range-relational-database-management/#comment-72977 Very good example indeed. I named the category while planning a webcast I was doing with EnterpriseDB's sponsorship. CAM Very good example indeed. I named the category while planning a webcast I was doing with EnterpriseDB’s sponsorship.

CAM

]]> By: Daniel Weinreb http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/15/mid-range-relational-database-management/#comment-72931 Daniel Weinreb Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:02:36 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/15/mid-range-relational-database-management/#comment-72931 EnterpriseDB (as you know) is a very good example of this kind of product. EnterpriseDB is to Oracle as JBoss is to WebLogic Server, very approximately. It sounds like a great business model. EnterpriseDB (as you know) is a very good example of this kind of product. EnterpriseDB is to Oracle as JBoss is to WebLogic Server, very approximately. It sounds like a great business model.

]]>