http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/16/stonebraker-database-taxonomy/ Choices in data management and analysis Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:22:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/16/stonebraker-database-taxonomy/#comment-88885 Mike Stonebraker may be oversimplifying data warehousing just a tad | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:39:54 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/16/stonebraker-database-taxonomy/#comment-88885 [...] Earlier I thought Mike was forgetting about the distinction between high-end and mid-range RDBMS. Naturally, that didn’t last long. He’s actually calling the mid-range systems “open source”, but that’s a decent first approximation to a hard-to-define category. [...] [...] Earlier I thought Mike was forgetting about the distinction between high-end and mid-range RDBMS. Naturally, that didn’t last long. He’s actually calling the mid-range systems “open source”, but that’s a decent first approximation to a hard-to-define category. [...]

]]> http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/16/stonebraker-database-taxonomy/#comment-88884 My own data management software taxonomy | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:36:00 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/2008/02/16/stonebraker-database-taxonomy/#comment-88884 [...] a recent webcast, I presented an 11-node data management software taxonomy, updating a post commenting on Mike Stonebraker’s. It [...] [...] a recent webcast, I presented an 11-node data management software taxonomy, updating a post commenting on Mike Stonebraker’s. It [...]

]]>