<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM discontinues the solidDB MySQL engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PrimeTime.jp</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77672</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeTime.jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IBM discontinues the solidDB MySQL engine --- DBMS2...&lt;/strong&gt;

【PrimeTime】、先週SourceForgeに掲載された情報によると、solidDB MySQLエンジンに対して、IBMからの開発アプローチは起きていない・・・・...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IBM discontinues the solidDB MySQL engine &#8212; DBMS2&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>【PrimeTime】、先週SourceForgeに掲載された情報によると、solidDB MySQLエンジンに対して、IBMからの開発アプローチは起きていない・・・・&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77474</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77474</guid>
		<description>Jay, 

Surely, Sun has the expertise to resolve the scaling issues with SolidDB.  They're already doing nice things for overall MySQL performance.  However, what additional benefit would there be to Sun in putting additional resources into fixing SolidDB.  They're already developing MySQL with all of its native engines, PostgreSQL, Apache Derby (JavaDB) and HADB.  Please, sell me on the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, </p>
<p>Surely, Sun has the expertise to resolve the scaling issues with SolidDB.  They&#8217;re already doing nice things for overall MySQL performance.  However, what additional benefit would there be to Sun in putting additional resources into fixing SolidDB.  They&#8217;re already developing MySQL with all of its native engines, PostgreSQL, Apache Derby (JavaDB) and HADB.  Please, sell me on the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Pipes</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Pipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77456</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Yeah, it's a shame that the engine didn't get more steam and/or funding from IBM.  It will be interesting to see if anyone from the community (or Sun, for that matter...) takes SolidDB to another stage.  I *do* see potential in it.  Any technical and scalability concerns certainly could be addressed with a little TLC I think...

Cheers,

jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s a shame that the engine didn&#8217;t get more steam and/or funding from IBM.  It will be interesting to see if anyone from the community (or Sun, for that matter&#8230;) takes SolidDB to another stage.  I *do* see potential in it.  Any technical and scalability concerns certainly could be addressed with a little TLC I think&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77411</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/11/ibm-discontinues-the-soliddb-mysql-engine/#comment-77411</guid>
		<description>I've read somewhere that the investment was abandoned for technical reasons too, lack of scalability, by the venture capitalists backing it.
This news should be in one of the many blog posts related to this that appeared on planetmysql.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read somewhere that the investment was abandoned for technical reasons too, lack of scalability, by the venture capitalists backing it.<br />
This news should be in one of the many blog posts related to this that appeared on planetmysql.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
