<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle&#8217;s hefty price increases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is doing what in XML data management these days? &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/#comment-89102</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is doing what in XML data management these days? &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=442#comment-89102</guid>
		<description>[...] comment thread to a post on a different subject has opened up a discussion of XML storage. Frankly, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comment thread to a post on a different subject has opened up a discussion of XML storage. Frankly, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Weinreb</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/#comment-89044</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Weinreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=442#comment-89044</guid>
		<description>My employer (ITA Software) already resents the big bucks we have to pay to Oracle for our OLTP system (airline reservations).  It&#039;s almost the only non-open-source software we use.  I am already looking into alternatives for the future; this makes it even more urgent.  (Recommendation to anyone in my position: take a close look at EnterpriseDB&#039;s latest technological advances.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My employer (ITA Software) already resents the big bucks we have to pay to Oracle for our OLTP system (airline reservations).  It&#8217;s almost the only non-open-source software we use.  I am already looking into alternatives for the future; this makes it even more urgent.  (Recommendation to anyone in my position: take a close look at EnterpriseDB&#8217;s latest technological advances.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zurek</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/#comment-88975</link>
		<dc:creator>Zurek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=442#comment-88975</guid>
		<description>Nope, we see little demand for XML storage, our V 8.3 has support for XML data type. If someone wants great XML storage then they should look at Mark Logic as a great alternative to Oracle XML DB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, we see little demand for XML storage, our V 8.3 has support for XML data type. If someone wants great XML storage then they should look at Mark Logic as a great alternative to Oracle XML DB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Grimes</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/#comment-88968</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=442#comment-88968</guid>
		<description>Um, Bob, doesn&#039;t Postgres Plus Advanced Server cover only the first item on Curt&#039;s list of 8 items?  But I recognize that #1, the core RDBMS where EnterpriseDB claims compatibility, is the big one.

Actually, here&#039;s a question that I might as well post here: Does EnterpriseDB provide technology that replaces Oracle XML DB for native XML storage and retrieval?  If not, do you see demand for this capability?  I admit that my question stems from a narrow concern, the ability to manage XML-annotated text in the DBMS without shredding the XML and mapping the data into relational tables.

Seth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Bob, doesn&#8217;t Postgres Plus Advanced Server cover only the first item on Curt&#8217;s list of 8 items?  But I recognize that #1, the core RDBMS where EnterpriseDB claims compatibility, is the big one.</p>
<p>Actually, here&#8217;s a question that I might as well post here: Does EnterpriseDB provide technology that replaces Oracle XML DB for native XML storage and retrieval?  If not, do you see demand for this capability?  I admit that my question stems from a narrow concern, the ability to manage XML-annotated text in the DBMS without shredding the XML and mapping the data into relational tables.</p>
<p>Seth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zurek</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/06/26/oracle-price-increases/#comment-88959</link>
		<dc:creator>Zurek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=442#comment-88959</guid>
		<description>They can always look to move from Oracle to our Postgres Plus Advanced Server offering with Oracle Compatibility to help reduce overall costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can always look to move from Oracle to our Postgres Plus Advanced Server offering with Oracle Compatibility to help reduce overall costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

