<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head to head blog debate between EMC, NetApp, and HP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/03/head-to-head-blog-debate-between-emc-netapp-and-hp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/03/head-to-head-blog-debate-between-emc-netapp-and-hp/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:09:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SANs vs. DAS in MPP data warehousing &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/03/head-to-head-blog-debate-between-emc-netapp-and-hp/comment-page-1/#comment-96890</link>
		<dc:creator>SANs vs. DAS in MPP data warehousing &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=517#comment-96890</guid>
		<description>[...] Vogel&#8217;s view over at Calpont. Jeff&#8217;s roots are in storage, and in response to my recent blog post mentioning storage issues he sent over a note I got permission to publish here. It says: The storage blog underscores the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vogel&#8217;s view over at Calpont. Jeff&#8217;s roots are in storage, and in response to my recent blog post mentioning storage issues he sent over a note I got permission to publish here. It says: The storage blog underscores the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/03/head-to-head-blog-debate-between-emc-netapp-and-hp/comment-page-1/#comment-96774</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=517#comment-96774</guid>
		<description>Calvin,

I don&#039;t think Chuck was being deceptive in what he implied about his role or biases.  Vendors advise users about how to frame issues all the time. :)

Thanks for dropping in your counter-argument links!

Best,

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calvin,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Chuck was being deceptive in what he implied about his role or biases.  Vendors advise users about how to frame issues all the time. <img src='http://www.dbms2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for dropping in your counter-argument links!</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Zito</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/03/head-to-head-blog-debate-between-emc-netapp-and-hp/comment-page-1/#comment-96772</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Zito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=517#comment-96772</guid>
		<description>What was most interesting about this whole mess was that Chuck tries to come across as an objective industry expert.  In his latest post, he so much as admitted that he was wrong about how he calculated capacity efficiency for the EVA. He then when on to make recommendations on how HP customers should set up their EVA&#039;s.  

I don&#039;t know about you but when I&#039;m trying to get the best performance out of my BMW, I don&#039;t go visit the Mercedes-Benz website to get info.  Now if I only had a BMW. 

Lastly, HP has posted several responses to Chuck&#039;s post on our blog at www.hp.com/storage/blog.  We&#039;ve also issued a challenge to Chuck to have a neutral third party determine who&#039;s array is more capacity efficient.  I don&#039;t expect Chuck and EMC to accept the challenge.  The dog has a loud bark but no bite!

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was most interesting about this whole mess was that Chuck tries to come across as an objective industry expert.  In his latest post, he so much as admitted that he was wrong about how he calculated capacity efficiency for the EVA. He then when on to make recommendations on how HP customers should set up their EVA&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you but when I&#8217;m trying to get the best performance out of my BMW, I don&#8217;t go visit the Mercedes-Benz website to get info.  Now if I only had a BMW. </p>
<p>Lastly, HP has posted several responses to Chuck&#8217;s post on our blog at <a href="http://www.hp.com/storage/blog" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.hp.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.hp.com/storage/blog</a>.  We&#8217;ve also issued a challenge to Chuck to have a neutral third party determine who&#8217;s array is more capacity efficient.  I don&#8217;t expect Chuck and EMC to accept the challenge.  The dog has a loud bark but no bite!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.190 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-02 18:05:36 -->
