<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vertica finally spells out its compression claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle Exadata 2 capacity pricing &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/#comment-142545</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle Exadata 2 capacity pricing &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=568#comment-142545</guid>
		<description>[...] *Greg Rahn of Oracle tweeted me yesterday that one customer is getting 12-17X compression on &#8220;dimensional model&#8221; data. That sounds comparable to Vertica&#8217;s claim of 20X on &#8220;marketing analytics&#8221; and 30X on &#8220;consumer data&amp;#8.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *Greg Rahn of Oracle tweeted me yesterday that one customer is getting 12-17X compression on &#8220;dimensional model&#8221; data. That sounds comparable to Vertica&#8217;s claim of 20X on &#8220;marketing analytics&#8221; and 30X on &#8220;consumer data&amp;#8&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick guide to Teradata&#8217;s announcements this week &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/#comment-99391</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick guide to Teradata&#8217;s announcements this week &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=568#comment-99391</guid>
		<description>[...] work underway that&#8217;s getting 20X compression in call detail records, versus the 8X that Vertica claims. I&#8217;ll post more about that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work underway that&#8217;s getting 20X compression in call detail records, versus the 8X that Vertica claims. I&#8217;ll post more about that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle Database Machine performance and compression &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/#comment-98134</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle Database Machine performance and compression &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=568#comment-98134</guid>
		<description>[...] Each of the customers cited below received &#8220;half&#8221; an Oracle Database Machine. As I previously noted, an Oracle Database Machine holds either 14.0 or 46.2 terabytes of uncompressed data. This suggests the 220 TB customer listed below &#8212; LGR Telecommunications &#8212; got compression of a little under 10:1 for a CDR (Call Detail Record) database. By comparison, Vertica claims 8:1 compression on CDRs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Each of the customers cited below received &#8220;half&#8221; an Oracle Database Machine. As I previously noted, an Oracle Database Machine holds either 14.0 or 46.2 terabytes of uncompressed data. This suggests the 220 TB customer listed below &#8212; LGR Telecommunications &#8212; got compression of a little under 10:1 for a CDR (Call Detail Record) database. By comparison, Vertica claims 8:1 compression on CDRs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Database compression is heavily affected by the kind of data &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2008/09/24/vertica-finally-spells-out-its-compression-claims/#comment-97871</link>
		<dc:creator>Database compression is heavily affected by the kind of data &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=568#comment-97871</guid>
		<description>[...] whose details I forget for now &#8212; they could only do 2.5X. Edit: Vertica has now posted much more accurate versions of those numbers. Infobright&#8217;s 30X compression reference at TradeDoubler seems to be for a clickstream-type [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whose details I forget for now &#8212; they could only do 2.5X. Edit: Vertica has now posted much more accurate versions of those numbers. Infobright&#8217;s 30X compression reference at TradeDoubler seems to be for a clickstream-type [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

