<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Somebody is spreading Teradata acquisition rumors again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/#comment-115489</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=735#comment-115489</guid>
		<description>The chances are very low that this is for real.

And given HP&#039;s reorg that somewhat diminishes the importance of data warehouse DBMS/product appliance success, this would be particularly odd timing.

The SAP rumor has always seemed nonsensical, as per http://www.dbms2.com/2008/10/11/patrick-walravens-sap-teradata/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chances are very low that this is for real.</p>
<p>And given HP&#8217;s reorg that somewhat diminishes the importance of data warehouse DBMS/product appliance success, this would be particularly odd timing.</p>
<p>The SAP rumor has always seemed nonsensical, as per <a href="http://www.dbms2.com/2008/10/11/patrick-walravens-sap-teradata/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dbms2.com/2008/10/11/patrick-walravens-sap-teradata/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Henschen</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/#comment-115480</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Henschen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=735#comment-115480</guid>
		<description>HP would seem to be a natural fit. After all, they&#039;ve been trying to replicate with Neoview what Teradata has already achieved. That said, the Oracle relationship would immediately become problematic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP would seem to be a natural fit. After all, they&#8217;ve been trying to replicate with Neoview what Teradata has already achieved. That said, the Oracle relationship would immediately become problematic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/#comment-115317</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=735#comment-115317</guid>
		<description>Actually, no.  Coffing&#039;s is a name I&#039;ve hears a few times, but I&#039;m not as up on the details as some other folks seem to be.

However, I&#039;ve heard the same thing offline from yet another distinguished analyst. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no.  Coffing&#8217;s is a name I&#8217;ve hears a few times, but I&#8217;m not as up on the details as some other folks seem to be.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve heard the same thing offline from yet another distinguished analyst. <img src='http://www.dbms2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Raden</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/03/31/somebody-is-spreading-teradata-acquisition-rumors-again/#comment-115311</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Raden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=735#comment-115311</guid>
		<description>Now I&#039;m not taking sides because I like them both, but you realize that Coffing and Teradata had a pretty bitter breakup, no?

-NR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m not taking sides because I like them both, but you realize that Coffing and Teradata had a pretty bitter breakup, no?</p>
<p>-NR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

