<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe Amazon should be using a real DBMS after all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Celko</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-117022</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Celko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-117022</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this is one of many reasons good DB designers use preicates and not assembly language level bit flags to classify data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is one of many reasons good DB designers use preicates and not assembly language level bit flags to classify data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Lybbert</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116973</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Lybbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116973</guid>
		<description>Thinking it over, while SQL doesn&#039;t have a solution to the problem, most SQL databases allow people to rollback to previous snapshots of the database (or restore old backups, or whatever you want to call it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking it over, while SQL doesn&#8217;t have a solution to the problem, most SQL databases allow people to rollback to previous snapshots of the database (or restore old backups, or whatever you want to call it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Rappoport</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116885</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Rappoport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116885</guid>
		<description>Heh, that&#039;s pretty funny!

There was someone from inside Amazon who said they were using standard software -- except for the most crucial bits.  They Implied that there&#039;s some old homegrown crufty software that they just use and try not to break.  

Also: ridiculous to allow any random person to make any kind of change to the global systems without signoff from management.  That&#039;s what management is supposed to be for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, that&#8217;s pretty funny!</p>
<p>There was someone from inside Amazon who said they were using standard software &#8212; except for the most crucial bits.  They Implied that there&#8217;s some old homegrown crufty software that they just use and try not to break.  </p>
<p>Also: ridiculous to allow any random person to make any kind of change to the global systems without signoff from management.  That&#8217;s what management is supposed to be for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul Duke</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116874</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116874</guid>
		<description>Database data should be under version control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Database data should be under version control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Lybbert</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116859</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Lybbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116859</guid>
		<description>I think the problem is trying to avoid false positives/false negatives when flipping the bit back.

How would you correct an error in a SQL database if somebody set true/false flag to null on every item in a table and then committed the transaction?

update items set adult = null;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem is trying to avoid false positives/false negatives when flipping the bit back.</p>
<p>How would you correct an error in a SQL database if somebody set true/false flag to null on every item in a table and then committed the transaction?</p>
<p>update items set adult = null;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116858</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116858</guid>
		<description>Yep. Tony Bain got to me on that on Twitter, and I edited accordingly. ;)

Thanks for the sharp eyes!

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Tony Bain got to me on that on Twitter, and I edited accordingly. <img src='http://www.dbms2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the sharp eyes!</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnHolyGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/04/14/maybe-amazon-should-be-using-a-real-dbms-after-all/#comment-116853</link>
		<dc:creator>UnHolyGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=750#comment-116853</guid>
		<description>SimpleDB is amazon. BigTable is google&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SimpleDB is amazon. BigTable is google&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

