<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenplum Single-Node Edition &#8212; sometimes free is a real cool price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:56:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BI-Quotient &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data warehousing for free! Terabyte sized data warehouse and business intelligence without license costs</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-145972</link>
		<dc:creator>BI-Quotient &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data warehousing for free! Terabyte sized data warehouse and business intelligence without license costs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-145972</guid>
		<description>[...] why are they giving away data warehouses for free? In another article, Curt Monash gives the following [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why are they giving away data warehouses for free? In another article, Curt Monash gives the following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144714</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144714</guid>
		<description>Having been a Netezza PS partner, and having worked for Dataupia, I know how much work goes into making Postgres suitable for &#039;big data&#039; use. There are real Greenplum differentiators in there when compared to Postgres (see Curt&#039;s article).

This is a very smart move by Greenplum from my perspective. The ability to scale-out from SMP to MPP when/if the need arises is very powerful, and not something many companies can offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a Netezza PS partner, and having worked for Dataupia, I know how much work goes into making Postgres suitable for &#8216;big data&#8217; use. There are real Greenplum differentiators in there when compared to Postgres (see Curt&#8217;s article).</p>
<p>This is a very smart move by Greenplum from my perspective. The ability to scale-out from SMP to MPP when/if the need arises is very powerful, and not something many companies can offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruhal</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruhal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144703</guid>
		<description>Unlike infobright there is a large user community providing production like scripts for Greenplum at www.gpdba.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike infobright there is a large user community providing production like scripts for Greenplum at <a href="http://www.gpdba.com" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.gpdba.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.gpdba.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keru</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144642</link>
		<dc:creator>keru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144642</guid>
		<description>As i posted on the greenplum forum : it&#039;s GREAT for learning and evaluation purpose.

As a DBA, i highly appreciate the 900+ pages greenplum documentation. But it&#039;s even better when you can *use* the software related to the documentation :)

And there is a LOT of difference between greenplum and postgresql (just read the first few page about SQL conformance of greenplum).

Running greenplum on a single octocore node can be good... as long as you&#039;re not IOBound :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As i posted on the greenplum forum : it&#8217;s GREAT for learning and evaluation purpose.</p>
<p>As a DBA, i highly appreciate the 900+ pages greenplum documentation. But it&#8217;s even better when you can *use* the software related to the documentation <img src='http://www.dbms2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And there is a LOT of difference between greenplum and postgresql (just read the first few page about SQL conformance of greenplum).</p>
<p>Running greenplum on a single octocore node can be good&#8230; as long as you&#8217;re not IOBound <img src='http://www.dbms2.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Werther</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Werther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144631</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a world of difference between running Greenplum and vanilla PostgreSQL for analytical queries. PostgreSQL is a great database, but on an 8 core box, each PostgreSQL query will only consume a single core and use 1/8th of the box. Greenplum will parallelize the query across all 8 cores, just like it can parallelize queries with linear scalability across many 100s of cores with the MPP edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a world of difference between running Greenplum and vanilla PostgreSQL for analytical queries. PostgreSQL is a great database, but on an 8 core box, each PostgreSQL query will only consume a single core and use 1/8th of the box. Greenplum will parallelize the query across all 8 cores, just like it can parallelize queries with linear scalability across many 100s of cores with the MPP edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Fin</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144615</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144615</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t believe such a move can provide a big value. How this is different from just running PostgreSQL on the single server for free? Also who is the competitor greenplum is going to Deprive? Are you pointing to EnterpriseDB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe such a move can provide a big value. How this is different from just running PostgreSQL on the single server for free? Also who is the competitor greenplum is going to Deprive? Are you pointing to EnterpriseDB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Zurek</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144594</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Zurek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144594</guid>
		<description>You can find out more about Infobright Community Edition here:
http://www.infobright.org/doc/specifications/

and information about our Enterprise Edition here:
http://www.infobright.com/Products/Features/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find out more about Infobright Community Edition here:<br />
<a href="http://www.infobright.org/doc/specifications/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.infobright.org');" rel="nofollow">http://www.infobright.org/doc/specifications/</a></p>
<p>and information about our Enterprise Edition here:<br />
<a href="http://www.infobright.com/Products/Features/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/www.infobright.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.infobright.com/Products/Features/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Pineau</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Pineau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144581</guid>
		<description>I think InfoBright&#039;s ICE version (if I recall the name correctly, the freebie version) is not really an option without any DML right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think InfoBright&#8217;s ICE version (if I recall the name correctly, the freebie version) is not really an option without any DML right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume Theoret</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2009/10/19/greenplum-free-single-node-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-144575</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Theoret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1158#comment-144575</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s very interesting. I&#039;m definitely going to give this a test run to see how it matches up against LucidDB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s very interesting. I&#8217;m definitely going to give this a test run to see how it matches up against LucidDB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.235 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-04 12:00:44 -->
