Comments on: Introduction to Gooddata http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/ Choices in data management and analysis Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:22:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: DBMS2/Monash Research: Introduction to Gooddata | GoodData http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-155129 DBMS2/Monash Research: Introduction to Gooddata | GoodData Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:02:58 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-155129 [...] Read more of Curt Monash’s Introduction to GoodData at DBMS2 Share this: [...] [...] Read more of Curt Monash’s Introduction to GoodData at DBMS2 Share this: [...]

]]> By: Science Report » Blog Archive » Database Questions for 2010: What’s On My Mind http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154783 Science Report » Blog Archive » Database Questions for 2010: What’s On My Mind Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:25:55 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154783 [...] I started 2009 with an interest in Web  2.0 OLAP and collaborative data processing. The field of collaborative data processing has progressed tremendously. Last year, we got Google Fusion Tables and data warehousing products are getting more collaborative. [...] [...] I started 2009 with an interest in Web  2.0 OLAP and collaborative data processing. The field of collaborative data processing has progressed tremendously. Last year, we got Google Fusion Tables and data warehousing products are getting more collaborative. [...]

]]> By: Database Questions for 2010: What’s On My Mind http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154746 Database Questions for 2010: What’s On My Mind Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:24:25 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154746 [...] I started 2009 with an interest in Web  2.0 OLAP and collaborative data processing. The field of collaborative data processing has progressed tremendously. Last year, we got Google Fusion Tables and data warehousing products are getting more collaborative. [...] [...] I started 2009 with an interest in Web  2.0 OLAP and collaborative data processing. The field of collaborative data processing has progressed tremendously. Last year, we got Google Fusion Tables and data warehousing products are getting more collaborative. [...]

]]> By: More miscellany | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154193 More miscellany | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:38:46 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154193 [...] of companies. The Continuent link above mentions one. So does RainStor’s latest blog post. Gooddata, a SaaS vendor itself, seems focused on analyzing data that was originally created via SaaS. I [...] [...] of companies. The Continuent link above mentions one. So does RainStor’s latest blog post. Gooddata, a SaaS vendor itself, seems focused on analyzing data that was originally created via SaaS. I [...]

]]> By: Introduction to Gooddata | DBMS2 — DataBase Management System … | Got Renter http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154133 Introduction to Gooddata | DBMS2 — DataBase Management System … | Got Renter Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:54:59 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154133 [...] post: Introduction to Gooddata | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System ... Spread The Word About [...] [...] post: Introduction to Gooddata | DBMS2 — DataBase Management System … Spread The Word About [...]

]]> By: Curt Monash http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154105 Curt Monash Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:13:41 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154105 Roman, My point was to wonder why your growth was so low. It looks like a big decline in absolute growth rate (for the free stuff, at least). Roman,

My point was to wonder why your growth was so low. It looks like a big decline in absolute growth rate (for the free stuff, at least).

]]> By: Roman Stanek http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154099 Roman Stanek Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:02:15 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154099 Curt, "2500 “projects” at the end of beta and 100 more per month" is easy to explain by the scalability of our cloud. There are days when we get "techcrunched" and we provision several hundred projects in a day! Curt,

“2500 “projects” at the end of beta and 100 more per month” is easy to explain by the scalability of our cloud. There are days when we get “techcrunched” and we provision several hundred projects in a day!

]]> By: Daniel Lemire http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154098 Daniel Lemire Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:39:47 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154098 If you like tag clouds and BI, then this paper of mine might be of interest to you: Kamel Aouiche, Daniel Lemire and Robert Godin, Web 2.0 OLAP: From Data Cubes to Tag Clouds, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing Vol. 18, pages 51-64, 2009 http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2657 If you like tag clouds and BI, then this paper of mine might be of interest to you:

Kamel Aouiche, Daniel Lemire and Robert Godin, Web 2.0 OLAP: From Data Cubes to Tag Clouds, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing Vol. 18, pages 51-64, 2009

http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2657

]]> By: Curt Monash http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154076 Curt Monash Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:14:42 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154076 Todd, It all depends on whether Gooddata comes up with viable sales & marketing strategies. We can safely assume that Gooddata's revenue goals are way more than the $100K/month they evidently haven't reached yet. Todd,

It all depends on whether Gooddata comes up with viable sales & marketing strategies.

We can safely assume that Gooddata’s revenue goals are way more than the $100K/month they evidently haven’t reached yet.

]]> By: Jerome Pineau http://www.dbms2.com/2009/12/27/introduction-to-gooddata/#comment-154068 Jerome Pineau Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:17:24 +0000 http://www.dbms2.com/?p=1341#comment-154068 @Todd, It all depends on the customer acquisition costs and the cost of actually running the systems which, using EC2, are shockingly low. I was myself quite surprised when I saw the numbers. Clearly, you need volume, but with a multi-tenant "switch flipping" approach to adding accounts, it's quite cost effective. That's the beauty of the "cloud" model when properly implemented and managed. Recall that SF didn't start with a large volume either. So I'd venture to guess GD's survivability is just as good, if not better, than most competitors both in the SaaS and other spaces. That's just my opinion. @Todd,

It all depends on the customer acquisition costs and the cost of actually running the systems which, using EC2, are shockingly low. I was myself quite surprised when I saw the numbers. Clearly, you need volume, but with a multi-tenant “switch flipping” approach to adding accounts, it’s quite cost effective. That’s the beauty of the “cloud” model when properly implemented and managed.
Recall that SF didn’t start with a large volume either. So I’d venture to guess GD’s survivability is just as good, if not better, than most competitors both in the SaaS and other spaces. That’s just my opinion.

]]>