<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Details and analysis of the VoltDB argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/2010/06/30/details-and-analysis-of-the-voltdb-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2010/06/30/details-and-analysis-of-the-voltdb-argument/</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An odd claim attributed to Mike Stonebraker &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2010/06/30/details-and-analysis-of-the-voltdb-argument/#comment-231947</link>
		<dc:creator>An odd claim attributed to Mike Stonebraker &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=2432#comment-231947</guid>
		<description>[...] week, Mike Stonebraker insulted MySQL and Facebook&#8217;s use of it, by implication advocating VoltDB instead. Kerfuffle ensued. To the extent Mike was saying that non-transparently sharded MySQL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, Mike Stonebraker insulted MySQL and Facebook&#8217;s use of it, by implication advocating VoltDB instead. Kerfuffle ensued. To the extent Mike was saying that non-transparently sharded MySQL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traditional databases will eventually wind up in RAM &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2010/06/30/details-and-analysis-of-the-voltdb-argument/#comment-223699</link>
		<dc:creator>Traditional databases will eventually wind up in RAM &#124; DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 06:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/?p=2432#comment-223699</guid>
		<description>[...] opinions at this time about marketing strategies or momentum at Oracle TimesTen, IBM solidDB, or VoltDB, but those examples at least serve to illustrate that memory-centric OLTP DBMS have existed for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinions at this time about marketing strategies or momentum at Oracle TimesTen, IBM solidDB, or VoltDB, but those examples at least serve to illustrate that memory-centric OLTP DBMS have existed for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

