<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services &#187; Alpha Five</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbms2.com/category/products-and-vendors/alpha-five/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbms2.com</link>
	<description>Choices in data management and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alpha Five claims to clobber FileMaker 9 on SQL performance</title>
		<link>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/01/alpha-five-claims-to-clobber-filemaker-9-on-sql-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/01/alpha-five-claims-to-clobber-filemaker-9-on-sql-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alpha Five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FileMaker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/01/alpha-five-claims-to-clobber-filemaker-9-on-sql-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Alpha Five guys decided to test the performance of their software vs. FileMaker on queries to a foreign database, and published the results. Given that Alpha Five designed and performed the tests, I bet you can guess who won. From a quick read, it seems all the tests were single-table queries, and some or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Alpha Five guys decided to test the performance of their software vs. FileMaker on queries to a foreign database, and <a href="http://alphasoftware.blogspot.com/">published the results</a>.  Given that Alpha Five designed and performed the tests, I bet you can guess who won.</p>
<p>From a quick read, it seems all the tests were single-table queries, and some or all were designed to highlight the flaws of a specific design choice made in FileMaker (doing certain work itself when it would be more efficient to push it to the foreign DBMS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbms2.com/2007/10/01/alpha-five-claims-to-clobber-filemaker-9-on-sql-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

