March 19, 2008

What to call CEP

It seems that the CEP folks are still concerned about what to call themselves. There really are only three choices:

“Stream processing” might once have been on the list, but it has too many other meanings, and “streaming” adds more meanings yet.

“Complex” has the virtue of inertia; CEP is the closest thing the category has to an agreed-upon name. But few people want to buy technology that describes itself as being “complex.” And in any case it’s not clear how complex many of those events are. “Event stream processing” isn’t terribly well established, and to some extent it runs afoul of the same ambiguities as “stream processing.” What’s worse, those names lead to four-word product category names. Who really wants to market or hear about “complex event processing engines” or “event stream processing platforms”?

So let’s just call the category “event processing” and have done with it, OK? Products can, if they want, be “event processing somethings.” Names like that wouldn’t be any more of a mouthful than “data warehouse appliance,” and the latter category is doing pretty well for itself.


One Response to “What to call CEP”

  1. Sandeep on January 3rd, 2009 8:35 am

    Event Processing Complexes

Leave a Reply

Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.