January 27, 2007

And then there were two: DATAllegro seems to be going with standard hardware

A while ago – for example, in a comment dated July 9, 2006 — CEO Stuart Frost of DATAllegro hinted that the company might port its software to commodity hardware before long. If this user story is to be believed, that has now happened. (Specific quote: “the Datallegro system is based on Dell and EMC hardware …”) Officially, the company is doing a Sgt. Schultz on the subject. But the evidence is pretty clear. And so it would seem that Netezza and Teradata are the only remaining data warehouse appliance vendors committed to custom hardware strategies.

Actually, I don’t know whether DATAllegro is acquiring Dell boards, mucking around with them a bit, sticking its own nameplate on, and still telling customers it’s a Dell system. That technical strategy would be reminiscent of Proofpoint’s, for example, albeit with a different marketing/branding choice. But I’m guessing that DATAllegro has gone to a pure software offering – i.e., a “virtual appliance” in Check Point Software’s sense of the term rather than VMware’s.

One thing to emphasize is this: Commodity hardware or no, DATAllegro is surely still tightly controlling the configuration of its systems. Of all the data warehouse appliance and quasi-appliance vendors I’ve talked with, DATAllegro is the one that makes the most fuss about getting just the right balance between disks, RAM, etc. Presumably, that’s in large part due to DATAllegro’s fondness for 2 megabyte block sizes – which is to say, 12 megabyte logical blocks striped across 6 visible Raid 1 disks per node. But I must confess that it’s quite a leap from that point to a claim they often repeat, namely that the whole system’s configuration needs to be oh-so-exquisitely balanced to achieve great performance.


3 Responses to “And then there were two: DATAllegro seems to be going with standard hardware”

  1. DBMS2 — DataBase Management System Services » Blog Archive » Dataupia – low-end data warehouse appliances on April 25th, 2008 12:06 am

    […] 1 appliances, which most other data warehouse appliance vendors (Teradata excepted) have moved away from. And there actually seems to be very little special about the hardware design to take advantage of […]

  2. The Monash Report » Blog Archive » Guide to my recent research on computing appliances on May 29th, 2008 5:49 am

    […] Half or more of the computing appliance vendors I’ve looked into follow very similar hardware strategies: They use mainly standard parts; they include uncommon but off-the-shelf networking (and sometimes encryption) accelerators; and they of course optimize the mix of those parts and general hardware architecture as well. (EDIT: I actually gave names to three strategies — even if they were just “Type 0″, “Type 1″, and “Type 2″ — in this overview of data warehouse appliance vendors. And in another post I considered arguments about whether one would want a data warehouse appliance at all.) Examples I’ve posted about recently include – and I quote the forthcoming column – “DATallegro and Teradata (data warehousing), Cast Iron Systems (data integration), Barracuda Networks (security/antispam), Blue Coat Systems (networking), and Juniper (security and networking).” (ANOTHER EDIT: But I think DATAllegro’s strategy has changed.) […]

  3. Infology.Ru » Blog Archive » Стратегии аппаратного обеспечения комплексов для хранилищ данных on August 25th, 2008 2:40 pm

    […] DATAllegro исторически Тип 1, но, очевидно, движется к Типу 2. […]

Leave a Reply

Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.