Complex event/stream processing vendors compete fiercely on the basis of low latency, down to the single-digit number of milliseconds, or even sub-millisecond levels. A question naturally springs to mind: When does this extreme low latency matter?

I think I’ve come up with a concise yet fairly accurate answer: Super-low latency matters when the application includes direct competition against a similarly fast opponent. The best example is automated stock trading – if you can exploit a market inefficiency 1 millisecond before your competition, you make money.

Other examples might arise in network security or battlefield systems, but I don’t know of any specific real-life cases. Instead, other applications for complex event/stream processing tend to be content with latencies that are easier to achieve. E.g., 100 milliseconds (1/10 of second) is likely to be plenty fast enough.

Keep getting great research about data management and related technologies. Get a FREE subscription by RSS/Atom or e-mail!

This entry was posted on Friday, August 10th, 2007 at 7:29 pm and is filed under Complex event/stream processing (CEP), Memory-centric data management. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.