Oracle is buying Endeca
Oracle is buying Endeca. The official talking points for the deal aren’t a perfect match for Endeca’s actual technology, but so be it.
In that post, I wrote:
… the Endeca paradigm is really to help you make your way through a structured database, where different portions of the database have different structures. Thus, at various points in your journey, it automagically provides you a list of choices as to where you could go next.
That kind of thing could help Oracle with apps like the wireless telco product catalog deal MongoDB got.
Going back to the Endeca-post quote well, Endeca itself said:
Inside the MDEX Engine there is no overarching schema; each data record carries its own metadata. This enables the rapid combination of a wide range of structured and unstructured content into Latitude’s unified data model. Once inside, the MDEX Engine derives common dimensions and metrics from the available metadata, instantly exposing each for high-performance refinement and analysis in the Discovery Framework. Have a new data source? Simply add it and the MDEX Engine will create new relationships where possible. Changes in source data schema? No problem, adjustments on the fly are easy.
And I pointed out that the MDEX engine was a columnar DBMS.
Meanwhile, Oracle’s own columnar DBMS efforts have been disappointing. Endeca could be an intended answer to that. However, while Oracle’s track record with standalone DBMS acquisitions is admirable (DEC RDB, MySQL, etc.), Oracle’s track record of integrating DBMS acquisitions into the Oracle product itself is not so good. (Express? Essbase? The text product line? None of that has gone particularly well.)
So while I would expect Endeca’s flagship e-commerce shopping engine products to flourish under Oracle’s ownership, I would be cautious about the integration of Endeca’s core technology into the Oracle product line.
Comments
2 Responses to “Oracle is buying Endeca”
Leave a Reply
[...] Oracle is buying Endeca (dbms2.com) [...]
I disagree about integrating dbms aquisitions into the Oracle product itself in at least one of your examples. I think lots of rdb got into oracle db. It just took a number of major versions. So you might have to wait half a decade for mysql to show some substantial synchronistic gains.
The bit about automatically deriving common dimensions just makes me laugh. I’ve seen fups with this going back 30 years in 4GL’s. I still see it every day with things as basic as customer definitions going from web storefronts or edi to more properly normalized ERP databases then back out to DSS. Automatically sending you down the super-slide to hell is more like it.