October 4, 2012

That multi-tenancy discussion revisited

Keeping in mind Monash’s Third Law of Commercial Semantics,

No market categorization is ever precise

I’ll try to clarify my response to Oracle’s claims about Oracle12c being a “multi-tenant” DBMS.

I wrote a couple days ago:

Oracle is confusing people with its comments on multi-tenancy. I suspect:

  • What Oracle is talking about when it says “multi-tenancy” is more like consolidation than true multi-tenancy.
  • Probably there are a couple of true multi-tenancy features as well.

Now I’m even having doubts about the second part.

In simplest terms:

But from everything I’ve heard:

More detail may be found at the links above.


2 Responses to “That multi-tenancy discussion revisited”

  1. Data(base) virtualization — a terminological mess | DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services on January 5th, 2013 3:39 pm

    […] noted back in October that the essence of multitenancy is a special-case version of ex uno plures. If somebody offered that and wanted to call it […]

  2. Thoughts on SaaS | DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services on November 24th, 2013 8:16 pm

    […] term multi-tenancy is being used in several different […]

Leave a Reply

Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.