April 21, 2008

Teradata introduces lower-cost appliances

After months of leaks, Teradata has unveiled its new lines of data warehouse appliances, raising the total number either from 1 to 3 (my view) or 0 to 2 (what you believe if you think Teradata wasn’t previously an appliance vendor). Most significant is the new Teradata 2500 series, meant to compete directly with the smaller data warehouse specialists. Highlights include:

The Teradata 2500 is coming out of the chute with two customers – a new-customer retailer buying a single cabinet (i.e., 6.12 TB), and an existing customer for whom fewer details seem available. So far as I can tell, the sales force has had the product since late January, although the first leaks I got incorrectly suggested the system would only scale to a limited number of nodes.

Other products in the announcement included:

The Teradata 2500’s performance should be below the Teradata 5550’s for three reasons:

The same considerations apply to a comparison between the Teradata 2500 and the older Teradata 5000, but in that case they’re offset by a year of Moore’s Law benefit.

Teradata’s performance claims for the 2500, in essence, are:

Teradata competitors’ stories are along the lines of:

DATAllegro offers a detailed critique of the Teradata 2500 based on pre-release information, both on functionality and the numbers. (E.g., they argue that 6.12 TB of user data counted the Teradata way isn’t as much as it sounds like; I’m checking on that.)

So what does this all mean? If the Teradata 2500 were as aggressively priced as I originally thought (my bad – I simply misheard their per-terabyte prices for absolute figures), this announcement would be a huge event. As matters stand – well, DBMS and other enterprise vendors’ “crippled” products don’t have a stellar history. I wouldn’t be surprised if, a year from now, we saw an upgraded Teradata 2500 series, with more aggressive pricing and features.

Alternatively: In the initial release, Teradata has chosen not to have any interoperability between the 5500, 2500, and 550 series. I think that should and perhaps will change, with the 55xx and 25xx working together in a hub/spoke manner. Otherwise, missing-features arguments like the one DATAllegro makes will be too compelling. For that matter, I wouldn’t be surprised if Teradata bought a smaller rival, in which case heterogeneous hub/spoke synchronization would be a really good idea as soon as they could implement it.

If hub/spoke integration is one feature I’d recommend Teradata get cracking on, the other – and even bigger – one is compression. All CPU/disk trade-offs notwithstanding, better compression is an obvious and big price/performance win.


6 Responses to “Teradata introduces lower-cost appliances”

  1. DBMS2 — DataBase Management System Services » Blog Archive » ParAccel pricing on April 25th, 2008 10:33 am

    […] or appliance pricing, and am posting the results as I get them. Earlier installments featured Teradata and Netezza. Now ParAccel is […]

  2. Oracle Exadata list pricing | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services on September 28th, 2008 1:47 am

    […] first approximation — Oracle’s high-end price/TB figure is in the same ballpark as Teradata’s, while the lower-end figure is in Netezza […]

  3. Infology.Ru » Blog Archive » Сжатие данных в СУБД выходит на первый план on October 5th, 2008 5:09 pm

    […] в плане ценовой политики, может служить как раз слабая компрессия. И так […]

  4. How to tell Teradata’s product lines apart | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services on October 23rd, 2008 3:55 am

    […] year, Teradata has introduced a range of products that flesh out its competitive lineup. There now are three mainstream Teradata […]

  5. The Teradata Accelerate program | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services on November 22nd, 2008 7:01 pm

    […] for the year has been “We’re not prohibitively expensive!”, starting with the new appliance offerings in April and accelerating with further new offerings announced in October. And the Teradata Extreme […]

  6. Data warehouse appliance | DBMS 2 : DataBase Management System Services on August 19th, 2012 3:29 am

    […] Teradata, which embraced the term “data warehouse appliance” in 2008. […]

Leave a Reply

Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.