July 28, 2009

The Groovy SQL Switch

I’ve now had a chance to talk with Groovy Corporation CEO Joe Ward, and can add to what Groovy advisor Tony Bain wrote about Groovy Corp and its SQL Switch DBMS. Highlights include:

One obvious concern about Groovy’s approach is RAM cost. If you’re interested in the Groovy SQL Switch, you probably have a large transaction volume, in which case you probably also have a fast-growing database. Absent some kind of manual partitioning, the Groovy SQL Switch currently requires you to have enough RAM to hold that in its entirety. The same comment, of course, is probably true about VoltDB.

Comments

2 Responses to “The Groovy SQL Switch”

  1. Groovy Corp puts out a ridiculous press release | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services on July 30th, 2009 2:14 pm

    [...] being about an awe-inspiring benchmark.  That part met my very low expectations, emphasizing how the Groovy SQL Switch massively outperformed MySQL* in a benchmark, and how this supposedly shows the Groovy SQL Switch [...]

  2. What are the best choices for scaling Postgres? | DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services on October 1st, 2009 11:29 pm

    [...] option for OLTP performance and scale-out is of course memory-centric options such as VoltDB or the Groovy SQL Switch.  But this client’s database is terabyte-scale, so hardware costs could be an issue, as of [...]

Leave a Reply




Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

Login

Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.